Part 2c: Full Tables, Textual Readings and Coordinate Reconciliation

These are active supporting tables for Ezekiel’s Tyre and Egypt Prophecies: The 430- and 70-Day Pattern. They retain every numerical comparison and substantive alternative in the source dialogue, including constructions that have not entered the Canon. The chronological tables govern ordinary model dates; the day–year projections and theological interpretation are identified separately.

1. Single-day points and symbolic boundaries

The common Exile B datum is JD 1503431.5. Subtracting this datum yields a continuous day difference; the shared displayed cell is its floor. A projected positive cell q receives the label AD q. For a nonpositive cell the civil label is (1−q) BC. A signed day cell is not an ordinary historical date until that projection is explicitly applied.

The source’s quoted scalar differences remain exact:

The source prints “about 400” for the city and 430 for the Temple. It does not print the city scalar JD 1507551.5; the row above is an explicit reconstruction of the stated 400-day correspondence. These within-week selections must not be used to overwrite the exact source JDs or the shared week starts.

The literal siege date in Ezekiel 24:2 is the tenth day; the carried week in these charts begins at day 5 and spans the fifth-to-twelfth window. The prophet’s call, 390-day completion and refugee report can intersect that carried window. Adding 40 shifts the corresponding completion to the fifteenth-to-twenty-second window. A seven-day elapsed unit has eight endpoint day labels when both boundaries are named. A particular oracle day and its containing unit can therefore be displayed together without asserting that they are the same boundary point.

The later lament and its missing month

In the adopted month 12 inference for Ezekiel 32:17, the refugee’s year 12/month 10/day 5 coordinate is followed by month 12/day 15:

(12−10)×30 + (15−5) = 70 days.

The reconstructed scalar is 1507726.5 +70 =1507796.5, hence B 4365. From the Temple scalar B 4150, it is 215 further. From the shared Temple boundary B 4145, it is 220 further. The source’s lower symbolic pair instead selects 4145→4360 =215. Its 4360 marker is five earlier than the inferred 4365 day point; the source has not supplied an independent proof that 4360 is the fifteenth-day or carried-week start.

A common translation of the later 3720→4150→4365 chain by−5 produces 3715→4145→4360. The original 1565→1995 action pair remains fixed in its full selected bookend construction; this is not a uniform shift of the entire chart. A uniform−5 shift would also move the action pair to 1560→1990.

The source names the 3715/4145 sequence as Nisan Column B after one passing Tishri label. Shared A/C are Tishri; B/D are Nisan. The numerical repair corrects that label without discarding either source construction.

Day-point CSV · Complete Exile CSV · Exile calculation JSON (ZIP) · Return CSV · Return calculation JSON (ZIP).

2. The complete bookend arithmetic

The four 430 blocks between the enacted sign’s completion and the proposed Ezekiel 31 boundary are enclosed by one 430 at each end. This six-block structure is the source’s principal mathematical claim. It applies to the selected schematic chain, whose point choices are shown above.

Seven base years give 2520 days. Counting one leap gives 2550; a separately declared two-leap seven-year placement gives 2580. For the particular call 593 Tammuz→Temple 586 Av comparison, the ordinary thirty-day month is also included:2520+30 ordinary+30 leap=2580. The 588 BC insertion remains the single counted leap in that interval. The two 1290 halves are a numerical partition of 2580; they should not be reinterpreted automatically as two inserted months.

3. Textual alternatives and the sixteen-year proposal

The BSB text and its footnote are checked separately from NET’s MT-based reader. The excerpt in the main study preserves the original’s abbreviated wording, individually verified against NET reader 107: “In the eleventh year, on the first day of the month…” (NET). Reader 107 displays the earlier NET text stream; the quotation is not attributed to NET Second Edition. The official notice at the end of this document follows the current permission terms. No translator’s note is reproduced here.

For 32:17, MT and current BSB leave the month unstated; month 12 follows the author’s contextual reading of 32:1. The LXX month 1 alternative identified in BSB’s textual note has a different placement. These inputs cannot be blended into a single date chosen for numerical convenience.

The whole-year interpretation and the inferred New Year point are retained alongside the date-level reading. The author argues for scribal economy and thematic cohesion with 29:17. These arguments can motivate a selection while leaving it an inference. They do not establish that the text only allows those two symbolic uses.

The following small exploratory comparison was introduced in the original discussion:

The original 5840/5880 comparison is retained as an exploratory proximity. It neither reproduces the reconstructed intercalated Ezekiel calendar nor demonstrates a 5880 day span between the oracles.

4. The complete dated-passage inventory

The first row’s fifth year is the exile register in 1:2; 1:1 also supplies a thirtieth year. Current BSB 26:1 uses year 12/month 11, so the catalogue’s year 11/month-unspecified row is explicitly the MT input. The final vision also supplies the fourteenth year after the city’s fall. The original list’s starting point is Jehoiachin’s 597 BC exile; the chart’s 598 Tishri/597 Nisan datums are seasonal reference labels and do not supply a second historical deportation.

Thirteen-heading CSV.

5. Every ordinary-node / symbolic-coordinate comparison

The original compares seven ordinary/framework nodes with generated AD coordinates. The complete grid below uses BC+AD−1 across the civil boundary, and ordinary subtraction within AD. The 1016 node is schematic; 1661 is the SP/harmonized 215-year-Egypt selection; 2091 identifies the Haran-to-Canaan departure; AD 60 is the selected Rome-arrival model. Native LXX’s 1843 Egypt reference is a separate branch, not automatically 1661.

Each cell is an elapsed span, not the AD endpoint’s historical identity. For the four main 1565/1995/3715/4145 columns, some source nodes yield whole 430 multiples and others yield half 430 multiples. For example, 1876 BC→AD 1565=3440=8×430, whereas 2091 BC→AD 1565=3655=17×215. The author’s broad “multiples of 430” wording is therefore retained more precisely as 430 or its 215 half-cycle. The 4365 and 4000 companions have their own offsets and need not belong to that same grid class.

The download gives all 49 cells with exact rational 430 and 215 quotients and flags rather than rounded decimal divisions: complete 49-cell CSV.

The principal expanded comparison is:

2091 BC→AD 60→AD 4360=2150+4300=6450=15×430=10×(215+430).

AD 4365 gives 6455 from 2091 BC and 4305 from AD 60. Those values keep the fixed earlier endpoints. Subtracting 360 from 4360 gives 4000; subtracting 360 from 4365 gives 4005. The whole comparison remains ordinary elapsed arithmetic plus a declared symbolic adjustment, with no formal Mirror reflection.

6. Further proposals retained from the dialogue

The Christological interpretation is developed in the main study: Egypt as compensation for Tyre; Ezekiel’s bearing of Israel/Judah’s iniquity; Joseph’s pit, sale and preservation in Egypt; Christ figuratively identified with Egypt in the burden-bearing comparison; the additional childhood-Egypt/Hosea connection; Jerusalem as Sodom and Egypt in Revelation 11:8; and Tyre/Babylon commercial imagery in Revelation 13–18. Historical, symbolic and Christological layers can be discussed together without treating the chronology as a demonstration of every fulfillment claim.

The original’s seven Egypt-oracle units are 29:1–16, 29:17–21, 30:1–19, 30:20–26, 31:1–18, 32:1–16 and 32:17–32. Six have the dated headings listed above; 30:1–19 is undated. The source’s difficulty finding obvious historical fulfillment is retained as motivation for an additional Christological reading, rather than a blanket assertion that the national prophecies had no historical referents.

7. The truncated chart fragment and source corrections

The source contains this partial pasted header/row, preserved in its original order:

Julian Day # Verses Event Ezek’s Dates & Yr (BC) Tish Datum “A” Nisn Datum “B” Tish Datum “C” Nisn Datum “D” Notes 1503251.5 A) Tishri Datum (Jecon’s exile)598 BC{0}{-180}{-4020

It breaks off in Column C. The exact spacing and typography remain in the archived source; this readable transcription separates the fields below:

The complete matrix controls the column definitions. The shared Return matrix has two raw datum-sign slips, retained in its JSON source values and corrected in computed active counts. All 140 shared cells remain identical to the editions used by Parts 1a/1b, 2a and 2b.

The original discussion preserves the historical wording without these repairs. The main study and these tables preserve the substantive argument with the distinctions needed to assess it.

Scripture quotations identified as BSB are from the Berean Standard Bible. The Holy Bible, Berean Standard Bible, BSB is produced in cooperation with Bible Hub, Discovery Bible, OpenBible.com, and the Berean Bible Translation Committee. This text of God’s Word has been dedicated to the public domain. Official BSB terms.

Scripture quoted by permission. Quotations designated (NET) are from the NET Bible® copyright ©1996, 2019 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. http://netbible.com All rights reserved. Official NET terms. The abbreviated NET quotation follows Bible.com reader 107; it is not labelled NET Second Edition. Translators’ notes are discussed separately and are not quoted.